Subject

Cost and management accounting tutoring in English

A cost accounting tutor for students on English-taught business programmes in Spain. We cover full costing, direct costing, overhead allocation, activity-based costing and break-even analysis, one to one and online, at whatever hour suits you.

Cost accounting is the subject where people say the theory made sense and then the numbers did not come out. Usually that is not a maths problem: it is not being sure which costs belong to the product and which belong to the period. That distinction is what we fix first, and everything else follows from it.

Message me on WhatsApp Send me an email

Online lessons, one to one, at the hour you choose.

Cost classification: the decision everything else depends on

Direct against indirect, fixed against variable, product cost against period cost. These sound like definitions to learn, but every later calculation hangs off them. If you classify factory rent as a period cost you will get a different profit figure from the model answer and you will not know why. We go through classification on real cases until you can look at a cost line and place it without hesitating, including the awkward ones like supervisor salaries, depreciation of factory equipment and delivery costs.

Full costing against direct costing, and why the profit differs

The single most examined comparison in the subject. Under full costing, fixed manufacturing costs attach to the units and sit in inventory until those units are sold. Under direct costing they hit the period in full. When production is higher than sales, full costing reports a larger profit, because some fixed cost stays capitalised in closing inventory. When the fixed cost per unit is stable between periods, the gap between the two profit figures is exactly that fixed cost per unit multiplied by the change in inventory. We prove it numerically so you can reconcile the two answers in the exam.

Allocating overheads: cost centres and activity-based costing

Indirect costs do not attach themselves to products, so somebody has to decide how they are spread. We work through the traditional route, collecting overheads into cost centres and allocating them with a driver such as labour hours or machine hours, and then through activity-based costing, where you identify activities, work out a cost driver rate for each and charge products by consumption. The exam usually wants both and a comment on why the two give different unit costs, which is the part most people leave blank.

Break-even, contribution and short-term decisions

Contribution margin per unit, break-even point in units and in revenue, margin of safety, and the effect of a change in price or in fixed costs. From there we move to the decision questions that come up every year: make or buy, accepting a special order below normal price, dropping a product line, and choosing between products when a resource is scarce. The trick in all of them is the same, work with relevant costs and ignore what will not change, and we practise spotting which is which.

Standard costs and variance analysis

Setting a standard, comparing it against what actually happened and splitting the difference into its causes. Material price and usage variances, labour rate and efficiency variances, and overhead variances. We work on the sign convention, favourable and adverse, because getting the direction wrong turns a correct calculation into a wrong answer, and on writing the short interpretation the exam asks for underneath.

How the lessons work

One to one, by video call, with a shared whiteboard where we build the cost tables together rather than me showing you a finished one. No fixed schedule and no packages: you say which day and time work and we book it, including the week before the exam. Bring your lecturer's problem sets and past papers. Everything we solve stays with you afterwards, in English or in Spanish, whichever you prefer.

Where almost everyone gets stuck

Forgetting closing inventory in the full costing answer

Working out the full cost per unit correctly and then charging all of the production against sales. If you produced more than you sold, some of that cost belongs in closing inventory on the balance sheet, not in the cost of sales. This single slip is the most common reason a full costing profit comes out wrong.

Treating the fixed cost per unit as if it were a real unit cost

Fixed cost per unit only exists at one level of production. If output changes, that figure changes, so you cannot reuse it to value a different volume or to decide whether to accept an extra order. For decisions, work with contribution and leave the fixed costs where they are.

Including sunk costs in a make-or-buy decision

Money already spent is irrelevant, however painful it is. So is any fixed cost that will carry on regardless of the decision. The question is only what changes if you choose one option over the other, and exam papers deliberately fill the data with figures that do not change to see whether you notice.

Worked example

Worked example: full costing against direct costing with closing inventory

A company makes a single product. During the year it produces 10,000 units and sells 8,000 at 50 euros each. There was no opening inventory. The variable manufacturing cost is 20 euros per unit and fixed manufacturing costs for the period are 120,000 euros. There are no selling or administrative costs. Calculate the profit under full costing and under direct costing, explain the difference, and find the break-even point.

  1. Revenue: 8,000 units x 50 euros = 400,000 euros. Contribution per unit: 50 - 20 = 30 euros. Closing inventory: 10,000 - 8,000 = 2,000 units.
  2. Direct costing: total contribution = 8,000 x 30 = 240,000 euros. Deduct the full 120,000 of fixed costs for the period: 240,000 - 120,000 = 120,000 euros of profit.
  3. Full costing: fixed cost per unit = 120,000 / 10,000 = 12 euros, so the full manufacturing cost per unit is 20 + 12 = 32 euros. Cost of sales = 8,000 x 32 = 256,000 euros and closing inventory is valued at 2,000 x 32 = 64,000 euros.
  4. Profit under full costing = 400,000 - 256,000 = 144,000 euros. The difference against direct costing is 144,000 - 120,000 = 24,000 euros, which is exactly the 2,000 units of closing inventory multiplied by the 12 euros of fixed cost per unit that stayed capitalised.
  5. Break-even point, using contribution: 120,000 / 30 = 4,000 units, that is 4,000 x 50 = 200,000 euros of revenue.

SolutionDirect costing profit: 120,000 euros. Full costing profit: 144,000 euros. The 24,000 euro difference is the fixed cost capitalised in the 2,000 units of closing inventory (2,000 x 12). Break-even is 4,000 units, or 200,000 euros of revenue.

Frequently asked questions

About these lessons in particular

Is cost accounting the same as management accounting?

In most Spanish syllabuses they overlap heavily and the module may be called either, or contabilidad analitica in Spanish. Send me your syllabus and I will tell you exactly which topics yours covers before we start.

Can we do the lessons in English if my exam is in Spanish?

Yes, and it is a common combination. We explain in English and practise the answer in the wording your exam will use, so the terminology in your script matches what your lecturer expects.

Can you help right before the exam?

Yes. There is no minimum commitment, so a single session on the specific topics you are shaky on is perfectly normal. Write to me with what you need and we will find a slot.

Other subjects

I also teach

Shall we work on it together?

Tell me where you are, which university you are at and when the exam is. I will get back to you as soon as I can.

WhatsApp